The Site C Dam project proposal engages the jurisdiction and lawful authority of Treaty 8 First Nations. Both the BC and federal governments have a constitutional duty to consult and accommodate Treaty 8 First Nations in making decisions about the project. The province’s decision to proceed with the Site C Dam was taken without proper consultation with Treaty 8 First Nations. There have been numerous flaws in the way the Crown has approached First Nations consultation on the Site C Dam. For example, the Crown’s unilaterally decided on the process it would use to consider and approve the Site C Dam, disregarding the mutually binding promises contained in Treaty No. 8. The Crown has also failed to involve First Nations at a high level of strategic decision-making about the use of the Peace River to generate
electricity when it made early decisions about the dam’s feasibility. The commitment to build the Site C Dam without achieving the free, prior and informed consent of Treaty 8 First Nations is likely a violation of Canada’s commitments under international law.
Related posts:
- Legal Comment on Coastal First Nations No Tankers Declaration Subject(s): Legal Backgrounder, Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipeline, First Nations,...
- Bill 17 – Clean Energy Act Backgrounder Subject(s): Clean Energy Act, Bill 17 Author(s): West Coast...
- Comments of West Coast Environmental Law on Metro Vancouver 2040 Shaping Our Future Subject(s): Regional Growth Strategy; Metro Vancouver; Sustainabiltiy; Land Use...
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.