From the inbox:
I came across an old post of yours: http://www.env-econ.net/2006/01/nc_ecosystem_en.html I am the reader you tipped your hat to, I believe. I wrote you well before 2006 to discuss environmental mitigation banking. ...
Your lack of skepticism regarding the ecological and economic wisdom of a program like the NCEEP disturbs me a bit. NCEEP directly compete with private firms, engage in a very controversial practice with lower standards, “In-Lieu-Feed” mitigation, and are regularly subsidizing impacts to the environment with public money.
Your lack of skepticism regarding the ecological and economic wisdom of a program like the NCEEP disturbs me a bit. NCEEP directly compete with private firms, engage in a very controversial practice with lower standards, “In-Lieu-Feed” mitigation, and are regularly subsidizing impacts to the environment with public money.
My reply:
My two comments contain the qualifiers: "it seems" and "?". Please
don't infer a lack of skepticism. A post like that is usually designed
to raise questions and not endorse projects or programs.
Related posts:
- Guest Post: Exploring Nonprofit Mergers and Alliances This is a guest post authored by Eric Kessler, founder...
- Canada Post may start deploying electric trucks The Canadian post office is looking at the possibility of...
- The worst blog post title of all time? My nominee: Cap-and-trade looks worse and worse, Greg Mankiw's Blog...
- Guest Post: The Grand Equivalence Version of the Coase Theorem Jim Roumasset, Professor of Economics, University of Hawaii: The Grand...
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.